Formal MDP: Consumption Choice Stage (OwnerConsumptionChoice)¶
Source:
packages/dolo/examples/models/doloplus/housing_owner_only_doloplus/stages/consumption_choice.yaml
Rosetta Stone¶
| DDSL abstract | This stage |
|---|---|
| Stage name | OwnerConsumptionChoice |
| Arrival state \(x_{\prec}\) | \((w, H', y)\) |
| Decision state \(x\) | \((w, H', y)\) |
| Continuation state \(x_{\succ}\) | \((a, H', y)\) |
| Control | \(c\) |
| Exogenous shock | (none) |
Model¶
This is the second stage in a two-stage housing period. The agent enters with cash-on-hand \(w \in \mathbb{R}_+\), a housing stock \(H' \in \mathcal{H}\) that was already chosen in the preceding housing stage, and the realized income index \(y\). The agent chooses consumption \(c\).
State and action spaces. The state at each perch is a triple \((w, H', y) \in \mathbb{R}_+ \times \mathcal{H} \times \mathcal{Y}\), where \(\mathcal{H} \coloneqq \text{linspace}(H_\text{min}, H_\text{max}, n_H)\) is the discrete housing grid and \(\mathcal{Y} \coloneqq \{1, \ldots, n_y\}\) is the income-state space. The action space is \(\mathbb{R}_+\) and the feasibility correspondence is
No shocks. There are no exogenous shocks in this stage; the arrival-to-decision transition is identity.
Transitions. The decision-to-continuation transition is
with \(H'\) and \(y\) carried through unchanged.
Preferences. The per-period reward is Cobb--Douglas utility in consumption and housing services:
where \(\theta \in (0,1)\) is the consumption weight, \(\kappa > 0\) scales housing services, \(\iota > 0\) ensures positive housing services at \(H' = 0\), and \(\gamma > 0\) is the CRRA coefficient. The discount factor is \(\beta \in (0,1)\).
Bellman Equation¶
Since the arrival-to-decision transition is identity and there are no shocks, the arrival and decision value functions coincide. The Bellman equation is:
subject to \(0 < c \leq w\). The optimal policy is \(c^*(w, H', y) \coloneqq \operatorname*{arg\,max}_{c \in \Gamma(w)} \{ \cdots \}\). The arrival value function is the identity:
First-Order Conditions and EGM Representation¶
At an interior optimum the Euler equation holds:
The EGM exploits this by working on the continuation grid. Given \(v'_{\succ}(a, H', y)\) for each grid point \(a\) and each discrete pair \((H', y)\):
- Inverse Euler. Recover consumption on the continuation grid:
- Reverse transition. Recover the endogenous decision-grid point:
This produces pairs \((\hat{w}(a), \hat{c}(a))\) for each \((H', y)\) on an endogenous grid. A FUES-style upper-envelope step is applied before interpolating onto a regular \(w\)-grid.
Shadow value. After obtaining the policy, the marginal value on the continuation grid is
Forward Operator (Population Dynamics)¶
Given a distribution \(\mu\) over \((w, H', y)\), the stage is deterministic, so the forward operator is the push-forward through the optimal policy:
and \(\mu_{\succ}(A \times \{H\} \times \{y\}) = \mu\!\bigl(\{w : w - c^*(w, H, y) \in A\} \times \{H\} \times \{y\}\bigr)\).
Calibration¶
| Symbol | Value | Description |
|---|---|---|
| \(\beta\) | 0.93 | discount factor |
| \(\gamma\) | 2.0 | CRRA risk aversion |
| \(\theta\) | 0.77 | consumption weight in utility |
| \(\kappa\) | 0.075 | housing service scaling |
| \(\iota\) | 0.01 | housing service constant |
| \(n_H\) | 7 | housing grid points |
| \(H_\text{min}\) | 0.0 | housing grid lower bound |
| \(H_\text{max}\) | 5.0 | housing grid upper bound |
| \(r\) | 0.06 | interest rate |